We've
all had this experience:
We attend a meeting of the Concerned Citizens of Whoville. Lots
of ideas are thrown around, in no particular order -- some awesome,
some awful. Maybe an argument breaks out over strategy. A few
people urge caution at every turn, finding reasons why every
idea won't work, or is too "risky." Others build castles
in the air -- plans and schemes which require dozens of volunteers,
piles of cash, and years to come to fruition.
Then we all go home.
Until the next meeting.
And at that next meeting, the exact same thing happens: We argue.
We brainstorm. We doodle. We wonder when the meeting will be
adjourned so we can go home and do something useful, like folding
laundry.
And everyone wonders:
What happened to all those plans from the last committee meeting?
Did anything get done since last month?
Who was supposed to do those things? (Not me!)
When will we ever save Whoville?
|
Ed
Doyle & Sam Pratt at Save Your Town Booth
(FOH picnic 9/03/05)
Co-founders
Sam Pratt and Peter Jung
organized Friends
of Hudson and successfully defeated the unfriendly expansion
of the St.Lawrence Cement Plant
|
For
those wanting to break this endless cycle of bad committee meetings
which are all talk, no action, here is a short list of how you can
stop having unproductive meetings, and start actually winning your
grassroots battles.
13 specific pieces of advice follow after the jump..
| NOTE:
This advice is pitched at organizers, but is also meant for
attendees -- so that you can hold your meetings' leaders more
accountable, or start your own Whoville Concerns group if necessary.
Not every suggestion will apply to every situation, so go ahead
and pick and choose whichever ideas resonate. |
(1) FORM TASK FORCES, NOT COMMITTEES
Don't have committees. Have task forces instead. What's the difference,
you ask? Good question.
A committee is a group which feels obliged to meet regularly --
and perpetually. There is no limit to the potential work they might
do, and no finish line in sight. Procrastination becomes rife.
The most likely result of a committee meeting is that three sub-committees
get formed. That just means more meetings, and more deferment of
direct action to tackle the problem you met to address in the first
place.
Committees tend to generate endless lists of ideas -- for someone
else to do. Committees get boring quickly, and attendance drops,
because there's always another monthly meeting where nothing much
happens.
A task force is a group convened to address a specific problem or
goal, within a limited time period. It has a clear purpose, and
a definite lifespan. When that task is completed, it can disband
-- or re-form itself to address the next task. But not until the
first one is achieved.
(2) DITCH ROBERTS' RULES OF ORDER
If you have to follow rigid rules of procedure in order to keep
a meeting together, you might as well pack it in now. Roberts' Rules
exist for one purpose: For someone in power to keep rowdies in line.
To be blunt: If the organizers of a group can't keep conversation
flowing productively through firm but good-humored direction, and
the attendees won't listen to each other unless someone cracks the
whip with a musty rulebook, you've got the wrong organizers and
the wrong attendees.
If you are in that situation, the mature folks in the room should
recognize each other, and form their own group to get things done
-- leaving behind the rest to call out "Madame Chairman, Point
of Order!" every three minutes.
(3) TITLES, BYLAWS AND MINUTES, OH MY!
Here's a little secret: No one reads minutes. Except the most pedantic
and least useful members of your group. What you need from a meeting
is a quick checklist of agreed-upon actions, with assignments of
who does what.
People also love to talk about titles and bylaws, because it brings
out everyone's combative or nitpicking streaks... and navelgazing
is a whole lot easier than actually doing anything.
Who will be Chief Indian, and who will be Vice Chief? What constitutes
a quorum? Were the minutes of the last meeting biased toward one
faction or the other? However will we structure our complex organization...
of seven people?
All these debates are substitutes for work.
So don't waste time on titles, bylaws and minutes, except to the
extent you have some legal requirement to do so -- for example,
the annual meeting of a nonprofit organization. If minutes are required,
they should be as brief and pithy as possible. Don't bother with
a blow-by-blow of every little thing said, because it just invites
quibbling from the above-mentioned pedants.
Do yourself a giant favor: Let the actions that people take shape
the group over time, rather than postponing action until you've
all agreed on an ideal structure. There is no such thing, anyway.
(4) S/HE WHO WORKS, LEADS
When you get to the point where you actually need titles, bylaws,
or minutes, you'll know it. You will have been through enough together
that the real "doers" will have emerged, and the talkers
will have faded into the woodwork -- to avoid the work that everyone
is being assigned, and held accountable for. Your leaders will be,
de facto, those who actually followed through on the tasks they
agreed to take on, and helped others to do the same.
(5) ENCOURAGE BRAINSTORMING...
The free flow of ideas is essential to a lively conversation, and
if you talk long enough, people do sometimes come up with surprisingly
clever ideas. So long as the group is able to recognize a good idea
when it appears, and then to follow through on it, brainstorming
is the fun and lifeblood of a good meeting.
(6) ... BUT HAVE A CLEAR AGENDA
But you also must have some kind of agenda going in. If people don't
leave feeling that they've tangibly moved their issues forward,
they won't come back.
An organizer of any meeting has an obligation to everyone who shows
up: Attendees should leave feeling they got at least one meaningful
thing done, and with an assignment for the next thing they can reasonably
achieve before the next meeting. Such results only happens through
real planning and conscious direction.
If your agenda for a meeting is just general discussion of broad
topics, you have two options: cancel the meeting until there's more
specific things to do, or have a working meeting.
A working meeting is one where you have a specific group task to
achieve. It can be as simple as folding, labeling, sealing and stamping
those 500 flyers. Conversation flows (and ideas emerge) informally.
Nothing may come of that talk, except social bonding, which is important.
Or great ideas may emerge, precisely because people are not trying
to "perform" as often happens in a formal meeting. And
if nothing else, you've got your flyers ready to mail out. Other
ideas for working meetings: hand-painting signs together; going
over voter or tax rolls looking for new supporters; having everyone
bring in their address book, to send notes to friends to get involved;
a homegrown telethon to drum up members or support... and so on.
It's guaranteed that people will go away feeling better about a
working meeting than an unproductive one around a conference table.
(7) IF IT'S IMPORTANT, DON'T RELY ON EMAIL
How many times have you said or heard this phrase in a meeting:
"I emailed him about it, but I never heard back"?
If it's important, don't just email someone. We all know how much
email comes over the transom every day, and how little of it gets
(or deserves) our attention.
Didn't hear back about that email? Then call the person. Send them
a postcard. Send a fax, too. Knock on their door, if necessary.
Do all of the above. In short, make a real effort to get an answer.
Only then are you absolved of the burden of getting an answer --
and you'll at least never rely on that source for answers again.
People are distracted in our society. We get far too much unwanted
email, too much junk (snail) mail, and too many telemarketing calls.
Americans are also working multiple jobs to make ends meet. So when
you need to get in touch, it pays to contact people in every way
you can. You may annoy 5% of people by being so persistent, but
most will be glad that you got through.
(8) KEEP THE NEW BLOOD FLOWING
All groups experience attrition: People move away, lose interest,
get mad, flake out, and, well, die. A steady (but not overwhelming)
stream of a few new faces per meeting helps keep things fresh, keeps
people on their better behavior, and introduces different perspectives.
Naturally you want to avoid a revolving door. If you have a totally
different group each meeting, that's not progress. But a well-organized
group constantly attracts more people, because it will have buzz
and excitement that others want to get involved with.
If meetings get too large, that's the point where you can finally
consider sub-task forces or new projects. Too many members? That's
the least of your problems.
(9) MAKE IT FUN AND COMFORTABLE
This should seem obvious: People are more likely to get things done
at (and come back to) meetings if they are held in a comfortable
place, where everyone can see each other's faces, and not have to
sit in the way back. There should be something to drink and munch
on, but nothing so elaborate as to be a distraction.
Seems obvious... But how many grassroots meetings are held in a
small room with 4-6 people around a little table, and the rest in
the peanut gallery behind them (where the conversation leader can't
see that they've got their hand up), with not even $5 worth of soda
and peanuts on hand? It's kind of silly, but people truly are happier
in a meeting if they have something which keeps their hands (and
teeth) busy.
(10) KEEP IT BRIEF AND TO THE POINT
Another key to continuity and success in meetings is: Keep meetings
short and brisk. 90 minutes is stretching it; an hour is ideal.
If people are having such a good time, they'll stick around and
keep talking more informally -- which is when a lot of the best
ideas and strongest bonds come about.
(11) IDENTIFY TALENT, PLAY TO STRENGTHS
An effective organizer recognizes people's strengths, and makes
use of them. Some people like making calls and have a good telephone
manner... Others hate it. The same goes for everthing from door-
to-door work, opposition research, design, writing factsheets, to
decorating the gym for a party.
Some of the most valuable people in any group are lone wolves. Put
them in a group situation, and they are almost useless. But put
them onto a specific task that taps into their strengths, and which
they can tackle on their own into the wee hours of the night, and
they'll amaze you with what they produce. There's no sense using
someone who could design a website around your campaign, or someone
who is adept at reading complex regulatory statutes, or someone
who is a good public speaker, to do something else which they don't
enjoy and wastes their talent.
And when others see what a great piece of work one of these people
has produced, they'll be motivated to do something equivalent with
their own, particular skills.
(12) CONTINUITY IS KEY
An underlying theme of many of these suggestions is continuity --
how to ensure that one meeting actually builds upon the previous
one, rather than repeating it.
It seems elementary, but this rarely happens: The leaders of any
group must check in with partic- ipants in-between meetings to get
a status report on tasks they were assigned, nudge them along, provide
help if they are stuck. And to remind them that they will be asked
for a report on their assignment when you all get back together.
If you just wait until the next meeting and ask, "So, how did
everyone make out with your assignments," you'll get a bunch
of blank faces back. Unless you enjoy feeling like a teacher whose
students never do their hoemwork, take steps to avoid that awkward
and irritating moment by reaching out beforehand.
(13) LEVERAGE EVERY CONTACT TO GAIN CRITICAL MASS
The most difficult phase of organizing any campaign (whether political,
or issue-oriented) is getting over the hump. Until you gain critical
mass, things look bleak... How can a handful of people sitting around
your kitchen table change anything?
Remember that every person who has expressed an interset in your
committee, task force, cause (or whatever you choose to call it)
has a world of contacts that even they may not be aware of. Even
the most reclusive person can be a vehicle for spreading your message,
even if it consists of bringing a small stack of flyers with them
to the dentist's office.
With every person who gets involved, squeeze out as much good work
and contacts as they can stand. Do they have a sibling, a co-worker,
or a friend, who could come to the next meeting? Would they be willing
to put your next announce- ment into an envelope, and send it to
their local Christmas card list? Turning a Gang of Four into a Gang
of Eight is as simple as each person bringing just one friend to
the next meeting... And while such exponential growth has its limits,
in my own town, we were able to expand a tiny band of 40 people
into 4,000 paid-up members, and stop a major multinational corporation
to destroy the place we lived with a massive, polluting plant --
despite the company spending nearly $60 million in its failed efforts.
You can prevail, whatever the issue is that matters most to you.
Ending bad meeting syndrome is one place to start. Good luck out
there. |